Can an Artwork Ever Be Grounds for Defamation? - Ocula
Could an artwork ever be grounds for defamation? Artworks can, in theory, convey a defamatory meaning. The principle was tried almost a century ago in the English case of Tolley v Fry (1931) where it was held that a caricature could be libellous.
Satire v. Defamation: A Legal Explanation - RM Warner Law
Apr 21, 2012 · Defamation is a believable false statement of fact that causes material harm. Satire is “the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people’s stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.”
Can a cartoon be defamatory? Under English law there is one …
Oct 25, 2018 · Under English law, the simple answer is yes. There’s no blanket rule that a cartoon or caricature cannot be defamatory purely on the basis that it is (allegedly) satirical or allegorical, or...
Washington Post cartoonist quits after Bezos satire is rejected
Jan 4, 2025 · The newspaper decided not to run Ann Telnaes' cartoon of tycoons kneeling before Donald Trump. ... last month agreed to pay $15m to settle a defamation lawsuit filed by Trump.
Hundreds of newspapers drop ‘Dilbert’ comic strip after ... - CNN
Feb 25, 2023 · Newspapers across the country dropped the “Dilbert” comic strip over the weekend after the creator of the satirical cartoon went on a racist tirade, calling Black Americans a “hate group” and...
How ‘Pepe the Frog’ went from harmless to hate symbol
Oct 11, 2016 · Denizens of the darker corners of the Internet turned an innocent frog comic into a hate symbol of the "deplorable" alt-right. "Pepe the Frog" first appeared in 2005 in the comic "Boy's Life" by...
Is satire in political cartoons fully protected? Ask the lawyer
Jul 14, 2020 · A: Defamation is a publication to a third person, which is not privileged (in other words, subject to some legal protection), that is false and damages a person’s reputation. There are two kinds...
Yorty v. Chandler - Wikipedia
Chandler, 13 Cal.App.3d 467 (1970), was a decision by the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District involving how strictly an editorial cartoon needed to be interpreted in lawsuits for libel.
Types of Defamatory Material - eReader
A prime example is that of the South African cartoonist Jonathan “Zapiro” Shapiro, who was sued for defamation by former South African President Jacob Zuma for a cartoon in which he depicted the former President, who was previously charged with rape and accused of undermining the justice system to avoid charges of corruption, preparing to ...
Why are political cartoonists immune from slander charges?
While their goal is usually to make people laugh, their cartoons and sketches can be humiliating, shaming or even offensive. Yet for the most part, political cartoonists are immune from accusations of slander and defamation. The reason for this is twofold.