The Citroën C4 is a car produced by Citroën, part of Stellantis. It was positioned to be the successor to the Citroën Xsara. The first generation production started in September 2004. For its first two generations, the C4 was a compact car/small family car, but it has been redesigned as a subcompact crossover SUV for its third generation.

In this video I give a fairly in depth review on my Citroen C4 VTS 180 and why I think it's a special and underappreciated gem! Could this be the very best modern day Citroen?

Oct 10, 2024 · To make the VTS, Citroen elected to fit the snappily-named EW10J4S, otherwise known as the 2.0-litre inline-four sister brand Peugeot fitted in its 208 GTI 180. In the bigger-boned C4, which...

Mar 27, 2012 · Throw in all the usual eco-model add-ons, including regenerative braking and low-rolling-resistance tyres, and you have a C4 that is officially rated with very fine mpg and CO2 claims.

Oct 7, 2016 · The prominent proboscis embossed with a huge example of the Citroen twin chevrons and huge swept-back lenses are shared with the five-door C4. But a long arcing roof and tiny vertical rear window ...

Jan 1, 2005 · Guide d'achat ESSAI de la CITROEN C4 VTS 2.0 16V 180 CH avec fiche technique (caracteristiques, performances, prix, puissance fiscale). Toutes les infos, conseils et avis pour bien acheter une C4 VTS 2.0 16V 180 CH.

Our verdict on the Citroen C4 2.0i 16V VTS Coupe. A noticeable and welcome improvement over the Xsara, Citroen's C4 stands head and shoulders alongside cars that are often perceived to be more attractive propositions.

2004 Citroen C4 Coupe 2.0 16V VTS specs, lap times, performance data, top speed, engine specifications, pictures.

Citroen C4 I Coupe (Phase I, 2004) VTS 2.0i 16V (177 Hp) Coupe 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 | Technical Specs, Fuel consumption, Dimensions, 177 Hp, 227 km/h, 141.05 mph, 0-100 km/h: 8.9 sec, 0-60 mph: 8.5 sec, 8.4 l/100 km, 28 US mpg, 33.63 UK mpg, 11.9 km/l

Oct 1, 2007 · The C4 Coupe has a narrower profile of 1769 mm, compared to the 1773 mm of the hatch, while its rear overhangs are longer than the latter’s 717 mm by 14 mm. And it just looks that much better. No need for further reasoning when deciding between the two, then. Unless, of course, you are an Iranian minister.