BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders, 2008 SCC 69 (CanLII), [2008] 3 SCR 560 [2] is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the nature of the duties of corporate directors to …

Jun 20, 2008 · For the first question, useful factors from the case law in determining whether a reasonable expectation exists include: general commercial practice; the nature of the …

Nov 17, 2014 · BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders [2008] SCC Facts: Plan for leveraged buyout of all shares of BCE, which owns Bell Canada, valued at 52B$, but which would seriously …

Nov 26, 2014 · Question in each case is whether the director acted in the best interests of the corporation- includes the need to treat the stakeholders in a fair manner. Also, court says that …

May 22, 2008 · The decision by the Supreme Court of Canada to allow the takeover of BCE Inc. clears a huge hurdle for the biggest deal in Canadian history and the largest leveraged buyout …

Dec 22, 2008 · The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released the long-awaited reasons for its decision in the BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders case on December 19, 2008.

Dec 19, 2008 · The case was an attempt by certain debentureholders of Bell Canada (the "Debentureholders") to prevent the proposed privatization of BCE Inc. ("BCE"). Background

Feb 27, 2025 · Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the …

BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders Case Solution. The Supreme Court had ample of cases in the Canadian aspect that clearly exhibit the duty of the directors of a firm or a corporation facing a …

Dec 1, 2014 · BCE says that it has contractual obligations with bond holder and respected them. Bond holder say that BCE did not think hard enough about how to mitigate their lost. ·Issue: Is …