Respondent Bailey presented evidence that he was continually mistreated by correctional officers during his stay at the D.C. jail. He was threatened that his testimony in the Brad King case would bring on severe retribution.

Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court interpreted a frequently used section of the federal criminal code.

Nov 1, 2012 · The Supreme Court held that the rule from Michigan v. Summers did not apply because Bailey was not in or immediately outside the residence being searched when he was detained. Also, none of the law enforcement interests mentioned in Summers were served by detaining Bailey.

Defendants received beatings and death threats from the guards while in jail, did not get sufficient medical treatment, and fires were frequently allowed to burn in their cellblock. While these fires posed no threat of spreading, poor ventilation caused the smoke to linger in the cellblock.

Feb 19, 2013 · After arresting the men, police discovered that one of Bailey’s keys unlocked the apartment’s door. At trial, the District Court denied Bailey’s motion to suppress the apartment key and the statements he made to the detectives when stopped, holding that Bailey’s detention was justified under Michigan v.

Oct 30, 1995 · The court held that Bailey could be convicted for "using" a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime if the jury could reasonably infer that the gun facilitated Bailey's commission of a drug offense.

Bailey . Docket no. 78-990 . Decided by Burger Court . Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit . Citation 444 US 394 (1980) Argued. Nov 7, 1979. Decided. Jan 21, 1980. Advocates. Edwin S. Kneedler on behalf of the Petitioner. Richard S. Kohn on behalf of the Respondents. Sort:

Bailey seeks to vacate his conviction, arguing that the detention violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure. In this case, the Court must resolve a circuit split surrounding the application of Michigan v.

Bailey, 444 U.S. 394, 100 S.Ct. 624, 62 L.Ed.2d 575 (1980), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.

Upon being apprehended after their escape from the District of Columbia jail, respondents were indicted for violating 18 U.S.C. § 751 (a), which governs escape from federal custody.