The -3 option instructs scp to route traffic through the PC on which the command is issued, even though it is a 3rd party to the transfer. This way, authorization credentials must reside only on …

Apr 28, 2011 · Versions of scp from early 2011 and later may have a "-3" option:-3 Copies between two remote hosts are transferred through the local host. Without this option the data …

Jul 26, 2022 · The SCP uses the -P (capital p) option to specify the port, while SSH uses lower case -p. Upd: I seldom use SSH with a non-standard port, and apparently, I never used SCP …

So it says debug1: Sending command: scp -v -f <path> right before it fails, so perhaps that means the remote machine has something messed up... Edit 2 I tried accessing my file by just cat -ing …

Aug 30, 2024 · The accepted answer of yrk does work if you are copying from a remote to a local machine. If in your case you are trying to run scp -3 between two remotes that cannot …

Mar 4, 2010 · I generally prefer to use scp though as it is easier to resume a partial transfer (or, though I know in this situation the questioner doesn't have the option) rsync as that is both …

May 8, 2019 · You can accept your own answer. (Also, if you can copy files to the remote machines, you can probably make a file .ssh/authorized_keys, either with ssh or scp, and this …

Mar 20, 2021 · scp can copy between two remote locations (with or without -3). balena-helper is not designed to be used in this mode. When rebuilding the last argument, balena-helper …

Nov 10, 2021 · Traditionally scp tells one host to reach the other and transfer the file. The machine where you invoke scp may be unable to reach the other host and the method will still …

I figure SCP is the best candidate for the job but don't really care, so long as the solution works! I cd to the directory containing the file I want (app.war) and type the following: scp app.war ./ …