Jan 31, 2023 · I own both. Both are cool, iconic guns. Both are pretty heavy when fully loaded. I believe the ppsh-41 is a little lighter if you use a stick mag. The Thompson feels better when …

Sep 22, 2014 · Both the PPsh-41 and the Thompson M1A1 were both classed as submachine guns, while the M2 Carbine is as the name implies, a carbine, designed to replace service pistols.

Jan 31, 2010 · By comparison, the PPSh is basically a rifle stock with an SMG action on it, which is poorly suited for the kind of combat an SMG is meant for. The PPSh also had a rather …

Feb 24, 2011 · Neither the M1 or the M1A1 Thompsons accept any type of round drum and it only fired at 750 RPM. Well the Model 1921 had 1000 RPM but came with a forward pistol grip and …

Oct 3, 2004 · Depends on how you define 'better'. The Thompson was better made and the .45 bullet had better close-range stopping power. But the PPSh was nearly 3lbs lighter and the …

Jul 9, 2007 · I can only go by what I've read, but in combat it'd probably be the PPSh 41. Comfortable to hold and carry, colossal rate of fire with a sensibly-sized magazine, and …

Nov 1, 2009 · In fact, I have had a chance to test all of these guns and based on my own opinions and experiences, here are some pros and cons of each gun: PPSh-41: + good rate of fire + …

Sep 2, 2008 · 1. The MP40 having a stock more inline with the receiver and with a slower rate of fire was more controllable. 2. In comparing the two weapons it seemed that the looser …

Feb 2, 2023 · Originally Posted By Shung: simple hypothtical question. as a collector, and admitting that they are both in excellent conditions, and from the same year.. would you go for …

Jan 31, 2023 · I own both. Both are cool, iconic guns. Both are pretty heavy when fully loaded. I believe the ppsh-41 is a little lighter if you use a stick mag. The Thompson feels better when …