Aug 27, 2004 · The NAD 7080 is by far more musical,with a glorious sounstage, with tremendous depth.Its main strength is its power reserves,detail,accuracy,transparency and speed. The …

Aug 30, 2010 · The NAD 7080 is by far more musical,with a glorious sounstage, with tremendous depth.Its main strength is its power reserves,detail,accuracy,transparency and speed. The …

Jun 19, 2007 · I have both a NAD 7175PE receiver and a C320BEE integrated. As was stated by Ferrari the amp section of the 7080 is the same as your 3080. My 7175PE is the generation …

Oct 3, 2000 · The early NAD Receivers the 7060 and 7080 were damn near good as separates. Although nowhere near the cosmetic beauty of the Marantz units. Also to my ear the early …

Feb 8, 2005 · The early NAD Receivers the 7060 and 7080 were damn...Also to my ear the early Oct 05, 2000 However in 1977 NAD used a video gain amplifier in...section of the Model 3080 …

Nov 25, 2008 · Oh, another goodie, really old NAD. I have a NAD 7080 reciever that is hard to believe good.( there is a review of it on Audiogon,and he nails it. Early pioneer is better than …

Mar 31, 2004 · A few days later did a side by side evaluation with the Denon DRA 395 to one of audios great receivers the NAD 7080, and was later evaluated with a Rotel RX 803 receiver. …

Sep 19, 2002 · the nad 3020 is an amazing piece of equipment.it blew every comparable amp of it,s day away.after almost thirty years it can still give some midfy units a run for the money.it …

Nov 25, 2008 · I am sure there are a few that have done what I am thinking of doing and would like to get some opinions on doing so.I have for years always had separat...

Aug 27, 2004 · The place where audiophiles talk. Ask a question; get advice. Or just speak your mind.