May 31, 2011 · Or to get the pull request onto a new PR branch git fetch origin pull/921/head:PR and then merge with your current branch, giving you a chance to review the changes git merge PR --no-commit --no-ff – MoonStom

Jun 11, 2014 · Since a PR cannot be edited in term of branch (see below), the easiest way would be to: create a local new branch on top of your current branch; push that new branch; make a new PR with the right destination. close the previous PR; reference the "old" pull request from the new one; eg. Supersedes #123 (as commented below by Rivera)

Mar 9, 2021 · This is known as "commandeering someone's diff", where "diff" here is the Phabricator-equivalent to a GitHub PR, or "Pull Request". How to commandeer (take over) someone else's PR in GitHub. ie: how to change the owner of the open PR so it looks like you opened the PR, not them. So, since GitHub doesn't allow commandeering a PR, here are some ...

Jan 19, 2017 · Raise a PR now against the testing branch. Delete the "feature-merge-to-testing" branch once done. Until GitHub fixes the issue with PRs in Desktop application. I think I'm gonna follow this procedure, which seems to work for me. Let …

Jun 26, 2011 · After a revert, let's say you did some further changes on Git branch and created a new PR from same source/destination branch. You will find the PR showing only new changes, but nothing of what was there before reverting. Korayem refers us to "Github: Changes ignored after revert (git cherry-pick, git rebase)" for more.

type:pr review:required Matches pull requests that require a review before they can be merged. type:pr review:approved Matches pull requests that a reviewer has approved. type:pr review:changes_requested Matches pull requests in which a reviewer has asked for changes. type:pr reviewed-by:gjtorikian Matches pull requests reviewed by a particular ...

Nov 27, 2019 · This is because github.event.pull_request.number is only defined for events triggered by a PR opening/closing, while github.event.issue.number is only defined for comments on PRs (the former needs a on: pull_request, the latter needs a on: issue_comment): this method allowed me to recycle the same action across different workflows.

Sep 19, 2018 · Depending on how you have integrated Github with Jenkins and what plugin you have have used, the method might vary. But usually you have support for "magic"-sentences that will retrigger Jenkins if added as a comment on Github. For example commenting "test this please" or "retest this please" in Github might retrigger Jenkins.

May 3, 2017 · Update 2022: While GitHub still has no native support for dependent/stacked pull requests, a few tools now exist that make it easier to manage a GitHub-friendly hierarchy of branches. My favorite is ghstack, which takes a stack of commits and turns each one into its own branch that GitHub can understand without losing PR history. You can then ...

Aug 19, 2016 · Is it possible to create a Github Check for pull requests? I know there are WebHooks, but is there a way to also hook into the UI? Aim: Pull Request made. Perform validation and update pull request if valid. Pull Request merged. Create web call to URL. Update Github issue with confirmation. What's the best way to do this?