I agree with the comment about consulting a lawyer (one who knows about software license issues, though). In doing these things (and more), they more than doubled the length of the …

In my understanding, the GPL prohibits static linking from non-GPL code to GPL code, but permits dynamic linking from non-GPL code to GPL code. So which is it when the code in question is …

Nov 13, 2011 · A standard GPL-licensed piece of code is pretty straightforward in intent. Anyone who uses that code is expected to release their code to all users when they distribute or sell it. …

Oct 11, 2010 · A MIT licensed product (perhaps 'application' would be better word) cannot include GPL code. You can add GPL code into a MIT product, but the resulting application can only be …

GPL v3 tries to close some loopholes in GPL v2. Specifically: If you distribute this library in an executable, you must disclose your source code by providing it either alongside your …

The console-based EXE is GPL since it uses a GPL library, and, as such, the GPL requires that it must remain freely redistributable by anyone who gains access to it. Yes, an employee might …

Jun 29, 2016 · The GPL does require that proprietary and GPL'ed programs "are not combined in a way that would make them effectively a single program." If your program is completely …

Sep 28, 2016 · gpl (v2/v3) Apache license; BSD license; The MIT license; The mozilla license; Edit: (Pointed out to me, by 3 people, no less) whether or not a license allows a user to use …

Oct 4, 2012 · It's worth noting that the FSF has historically encouraged code to be licensed under the GPLv2 or later; the suggested text for LICENSE files is, "This program is free software; …

If I write a library that is released under the terms of the GPL v2 (or higher, at option); may that library depend on another library released under the LGPL v3 (or higher), without implicitly …