Before trying to bring up 607 BCE with someone, you should have already read this article and be familiar with how Watchtower tries to defend the fictional date of 607 BCE primarily by …

If 588 BCE. marked the 37th year of Nebuchadnezzar, then his 19th year would be 607 BCE. (588+19=607) On that astronomical tablet mentioned, we read that the moon was in a certain …

Aug 3, 2021 · 587 vs 607. Could anyone provide me with facts/arguments/resources regarding why 587 is the correct date for the fall of Jerusalem instead of 607?

Mar 10, 2024 · If 607 BCE is not the correct date for the destruction of Jerusalem, then the 2,520 years calculation to 1914 is incorrect, which means that Jesus didn't become King invisibly in …

This means 607 BCE became the "center of the calendar" for the JW fictional calendar. Everything else has been falsely "adjusted" to fit 607 BCE, before, and including, 607 BCE as …

Mar 14, 2023 · I asked ChatGPT to write a 500 word essay on the inaccuracy of JW belief on 607 BCE. Here’s the result. Jehovah’s Witnesses are known for their unique interpretation of …

Feb 24, 2018 · In 1913 Martin Anstey published his discovery that the Jews returned from Babylon in 455 BCE. If so, the 70-year exile began in 525 BCE, year 23 of Nebuchadnezzar. …

Sep 3, 2020 · The real reason why the organization will never give up 607 BCE as the date for Jerusalem's destruction.

Mar 12, 2024 · The Watchtower and secular historians agree that Babylon fell in 539 BCE. The Watchtower also teach, and Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that the Jews were in servitude …

May 6, 2023 · The tense used in this sentence is future tense. The auxiliary verb "will" indicates that the action of Jerusalem being trampled on by the nations has not happened yet and is …