In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court of Uganda (SCU) unequivocally ruled that the General Court Martial lacks ...

The recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Uganda in the case of Attorney General vs. Hon. Micheal Kabaziguruka ...

For as long as we’ve had democracies, majority rule has left some in the minority worse off. We need to be talking about what ...

Despite the multitude of factors and considerations that comprise the best interests doctrine, the current (and, potentially, ...

Good laws and compliance Some law making principles for societies in the age of abusive constitutionalism and regulation ...

It is despicable that a foreign politician would try to challenge our rule of law and undermine our national security.

By Gabriel T. Ingles, former Associate Justice of the Court of Appeals IN MY previous article entitled “Lawyering is not ...

The rejection of Carter Morupisi’s request to withdraw his appeal has sparked a conflagration of debate, leaving the public ...

IT is always enlightening to examine the footnotes in a court decision, as they illuminate the reasoning behind judicial verdicts and deepen our understanding of how courts resolve legal disputes.

"In this article, we provide an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far. We ...

If there is disagreement with a court ruling, the proper recourse is legal appeal or constitutional amendment--not political rebuke or executive interference in judicial matters.

By Eugene R Fidell and Navdeep SinghThe Supreme Court of Uganda has handed out a landmark ruling invalidating the trial of ...